Which is better? Photoshop or Illustrator? We were quite surprised to get this letter, but always willing to help a reader... Dawn, this is a common and frequent question, but Illustrator is NOT a 'less expensive' version of Photoshop. The programs -- although very similar due to Adobe's 'convergence' of the programs -- are in fact fundamentally different, and therefore should not be considered a 'replacement' for each other. A less expensive version of Photoshop is Photoshop Elements (PSE) PSE does about 90% of what Photoshop does without the higher-end pre-press printing capabilities. We've found there's very little you can't do with PSE that you can with PS. Richard Lynche's 'Photoshop Elements Secrets' then makes up the short fall by revealing 'how' to do the other 10% to achieve full Photoshop capabilities with PSE. I advocate Adobe Photoshop Elements (Windows, or Mac) for all beginners, students, and 'hobbyist' who don't need the high-end aspects of PS, or who cannot embark on a steep learning curve to achieve modest results. PS is a 'bitmap' image processing and manipulation program. It's ideally suited for creating, modifying and outputting digital images of a photographic nature, which share a common fundamental structure: pixels in a bitmap. Simplified, but primary operations would be: Illustrator is a vector-based postscript drawing program. It functions by generating curved paths (Bezier curves) connected by modifiable anchor points. These anchors, with their handles are ultimately editable, and never 'leave' the structure of the file. A vector based drawing program creates the various elements of the image as individual vector objects which retain their characteristics and do not become part of a 'bitmap'. Fundamental difference: Illustrator generates 'vector objects' which are not part of a 'bitmap' Again... both programs share many of the capabilities of the other. Photoshop can create 'vector objects' like shapes and typography. However they become part of the 'bitmap' once rasterized. (Once the file is 'finished'.) Illustrator offers painting, brushes, colorizing and can even import and manipulate 'bitmapped' images -- however these are all 'vector objects' NOT bitmaps. So it can become confusing. Most professionals and higher-end hobbyist prefer to own both programs because of their unique capabilities which complement each other. If you need to acquire, modify, print or deploy to the web images of a 'photographic' nature, then PS or PSE would be the program of choice. If you need to create complicated graphics like maps, logos, schematics, or even publications for print like ads, brochures, menus, etc, -- particularly with typography -- then Illustrator is the one. The above is a very basic explanation. Both programs have so many features one would be at a loss to decide which is 'best' ... they're both 'best'. The projects and activities one encounters most often should dictate which software would be the most beneficial if only purchasing one. Saving Money? For what you described above, Photoshop Elements is probably the most ideal for your constituency. It's available for under $100 from many vendors, and even less as a bundled product with scanners, digital cameras, etc. You did not say which operating system you're using, but I'm assuming it's Windows since the largest percentage of emergencies we field are from Windows users. If you're using Macs, download a copy of GraphicsConverter. It's a shareware Photoshop 'surrogate' of sorts. There are many others for Macs and Windows -- however there are NO surrogates for Illustrator. And that wraps up another case study from the emergency calls at Photoshop 911 dot com. To see more case studies, and tips generated from Photoshop911 just go to our Tips & Tricks department. Source.

Яндекс.Метрика Рейтинг@Mail.ru Free Web Counter
page counter
Last Modified: April 24, 2016 @ 10:12 pm